Re: EOWG: Reading and Agenda for 11 August 2006 Teleconference

This new process document explains the 
process at the right tone.  It will 
work for people who know something 
about accessibility and web standards 
and need to know specifics about the 
W3C phases of standards development, 
review and approval.  It seems 
consistent with the described 

I think we should minimize the use of 
internal abbreviations and and 
acronyms.  Based on our personae they 
know what they are do in the 
disability access realm, but they 
don't know how W3C works.  Fragments 
like IG and WG are especially 

I think the goal here is to keep the 
topic list short as possible to hit 
our two page limit, but spend words on 
simple language explanations.

The current draft goes well along this 


Wayne Dick PhD
Chair Computer Engineering and 
Computer Science, CSU, Long Beach
Coordinator of Academic Technology 
Accessibility, CSU System

Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 23:57:16 UTC