EOWG: Updated Agenda & Readings for 24 February 2006 Teleconference

Update: Added item #3 below, Agenda for EOWG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary


Dear EOWG Participants:

An agenda and calling logistics for our 24 February 2006 teleconference follow.

Key readings & questions are starred with *** below.

Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:      Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665

Scribe:  See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html

1. "Combining Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility" [was: "Review Teams 

Our discussion will be on the sections that we didn't discuss last week in:
- Combining Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility:
***  http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/combining-expertise-20060216.html

*** Questions include:
      a. Does "opportunities for collaborative eval" section work better 
than prev "types of teams" section?
      b. How's the content in the "considerations" section?
      c. Any other issues w/ this latest revision?
      d. Check the two questions in the 9 Feb changelog

Background materials include:
- About "Combining Expertise..." [document requirements]
- Changelog:
- Minutes from previous discussions:

2. BAD (Before After Demo) Overview page

- Discuss "Using the Demonstration" section at:
***     http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/#howto
        This is a continuation of the discussion in the 27 January 

*** Questions:
      a. Do these mini-scenarios for using the demo work (e.g., help 
people get into the suite?)
      b. Are they clear and accurate?

3. Agenda for EOWG meeting at W3C Technical Plenary
- Discuss plan for agenda:

4. "Retrofitting" doc (currently titled "Improving the Accessibility of 
Your Web Site")

Discuss the first three sections:
*** Introduction:
*** Getting Started:
*** Identifying the Issues:

*** Questions:
      a. How well does the introduction set up and position the document?
      b. There are a few sentences in [brackets]. Should we include those 
or not?
      c. How does the use of terminology retrofitting/repairing/barriers/ 
      d. What about the title?

NOTE: The first three sections are complete in content, although still with 
some questions and refinements needed. The rest of the document is *not* 
ready for review yet.

Background material:
- About Retrofitting Web Sites for Accessibility:
- Links to previous drafts, minutes from telecons, e-mails, etc.:


~ Shawn & Judy


IRC reminders and tips:
- IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All 
substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
- to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type 
/me comment - e.g.:
/me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
will come out:
*shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/

* Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings


Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530
32 Vassar Street
Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA

Received on Thursday, 23 February 2006 18:40:54 UTC