W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Review Request [was: Fwd: Reading for 17 Feb teleconf: "Combining Expertise" redraft]

From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:11:04 +0100
Message-Id: <EF19A399-74FE-42E3-97DE-895485104EA9@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Hi Judy, hi all.

I find the two sections clear and very effective.

In "Considerations in Combining Expertise" section I really like the  
sequence:
- Developing a distributed evaluation capability across an organization
- Identification of external expertise
- Involving users in evaluation
- Facilitating collaboration through shared tools and templates
- ...

It's the best strategy to implement.

regards
ciao

~ pasquale










Il giorno 17/feb/06, alle ore 21:52, Judy Brewer ha scritto:

>
> Hi EOWG:
>
> As discussed in today's call, we did not make it all the way  
> through this redraft, and it would be helpful to have more  
> discussion online by early next week.
>
> If you have comments on the questions below, please send them to  
> the EOWG list. In particular, as we did not finish our walk-through  
> of the latter two sections of the draft, please read through
>         <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/combining- 
> expertise-20060216.html#collaboration>
> and
>         <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/combining- 
> expertise-20060216.html#considerations>
> and send in any thoughts that you have about the content.
>
> For instance:
> - is the information in these sections likely to be helpful for the  
> different kinds of audiences that we're addressing?
> - is the information clear, and does it seem accurate based on  
> effective collaborative evaluation processes that you've seen or  
> been involved in?
> - are there other kinds of information that would be useful to  
> include among these items?
>
> Please send your comments to the w3c-wai-eo@w3.org list, to  
> encourage discussion. It would be helpful also if you take the time  
> to reply back to colleagues' comments, either to indicate agreement  
> or to present a different view.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> - Judy
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 17:11:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:38 UTC