- From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:11:04 +0100
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Judy, hi all. I find the two sections clear and very effective. In "Considerations in Combining Expertise" section I really like the sequence: - Developing a distributed evaluation capability across an organization - Identification of external expertise - Involving users in evaluation - Facilitating collaboration through shared tools and templates - ... It's the best strategy to implement. regards ciao ~ pasquale Il giorno 17/feb/06, alle ore 21:52, Judy Brewer ha scritto: > > Hi EOWG: > > As discussed in today's call, we did not make it all the way > through this redraft, and it would be helpful to have more > discussion online by early next week. > > If you have comments on the questions below, please send them to > the EOWG list. In particular, as we did not finish our walk-through > of the latter two sections of the draft, please read through > <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/combining- > expertise-20060216.html#collaboration> > and > <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/combining- > expertise-20060216.html#considerations> > and send in any thoughts that you have about the content. > > For instance: > - is the information in these sections likely to be helpful for the > different kinds of audiences that we're addressing? > - is the information clear, and does it seem accurate based on > effective collaborative evaluation processes that you've seen or > been involved in? > - are there other kinds of information that would be useful to > include among these items? > > Please send your comments to the w3c-wai-eo@w3.org list, to > encourage discussion. It would be helpful also if you take the time > to reply back to colleagues' comments, either to indicate agreement > or to present a different view. > > Many thanks, > > - Judy >
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 17:11:14 UTC