Review Request [was: Fwd: Reading for 17 Feb teleconf: "Combining Expertise" redraft]


As discussed in today's call, we did not make it all the way through this 
redraft, and it would be helpful to have more discussion online by early 
next week.

If you have comments on the questions below, please send them to the EOWG 
list. In particular, as we did not finish our walk-through of the latter 
two sections of the draft, please read through
and send in any thoughts that you have about the content.

For instance:
- is the information in these sections likely to be helpful for the 
different kinds of audiences that we're addressing?
- is the information clear, and does it seem accurate based on effective 
collaborative evaluation processes that you've seen or been involved in?
- are there other kinds of information that would be useful to include 
among these items?

Please send your comments to the list, to encourage 
discussion. It would be helpful also if you take the time to reply back to 
colleagues' comments, either to indicate agreement or to present a 
different view.

Many thanks,

- Judy

>Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 19:02:26 -0500
>To: EOWG <>
>From: Judy Brewer <>
>Subject: Reading for 17 Feb teleconf: "Combining Expertise" redraft
>Hi all,
>Following our teleconference on 10 Feb, where we reviewed the 
>requirements, changelog, and revised draft of "Review Teams for Evaluating 
>Web Accessibility," I've done a major reworking of the document.
>We will be adjusting the agenda based on availability of drafts for 
>discussion. A main focus will be on this revised draft, so please read 
>this if you have the opportunity before the call.
>Our primary discussion will be on:
>         Combining Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility
>         This is roughly the same document as "review teams," but with a 
> new name
>         It has been significantly revised
>Related materials include:
>         About Combining Expertise... [this is the document requirements, 
> which has been updated]
>         Changelog
>         Existing version on our site:
>         Draft from last week:
>Discussion questions include:
>         1. Approval of revised document requirements?
>         2. Does the focus on "combining expertise" work?
>         3. Does the new document title work?
>         4. Do the revised section headers work?
>         5. Does the flipped order of the sections work?
>         6. Revised intro okay?
>         7. Does "opportunities for collaborative eval" section work 
> better than prev "types of teams" section?
>         8. How's the content in the "considerations" section?
>         9. Other? (see also qu's on changelog items)
>- Judy
>Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741
>Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530
>32 Vassar Street
>Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA

Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530
32 Vassar Street
Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA

Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 20:54:19 UTC