- From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 07:38:23 +0200
- To: Wayne Dick ' <Wed@csulb.edu>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <AF1A513A-AFA1-4B20-B5FF-0D7CF504D504@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Hi Wayne, I strongly agree with you about title of the document "Understanding WCAG 2.0" [1] [2] Regards ciao ~ pasquale [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2005OctDec/0120.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2006JanMar/0008.html Il giorno 01/mag/06, alle ore 04:06, Wayne Dick ' ha scritto: > Hi Group, > > To me the title "Understanding WCAG 2.0" is missleading. If you > don't understand POUR or the numbering scheme. It is a great link > from WCAG 2.0, but it doesn't stand alone. It reads like a > glossary. If I was a first looking into WCAG 2.0, I'd read the > "Understanding..." document first, and it would go down well. In > fact, I'd probably quit. > > So, I suggest an informal but accurate name like "A Careful Walk > Through the WCAG 2.0 Guidelines". The introduction should briefly > recap the principles with a link to the section "The Four > Principles of Accessibility " of WCAG. It should also explain the > guideline numbering scheme. Also, there should be an explanation > that this is not an overview to be read before launching into the > Guidelines. Instead it should state that it is meant to be read > with the guidelines to expand on and explain difficult details of > the individual guidelines. > > Does anyone else share this feeing? > > Wayne > > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 05:38:46 UTC