- From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:09:43 +0100
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Cc: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Judy, hi all. Some thoughts for next teleconference. - For WCAG review - About the title of "Understanding WCAG 2.0" document. I think the document is very complete, useful and well formed. But I think that the title "Understanding WCAG 2.0" induces the reader to think that the WCAG are so difficult that it is necessary to read a document of 120 printed pages to let reader understand them. Maybe a title like "Describing WCAG 2.0 in detail", "Detailing WCAG 2.0" or "WCAG 2.0 in detail" works better. - For ATAG review - The conformance mechanism is clearer than before. The only thing I would like to comment is about about word "ability" in the sentence: "Everyone should have the ability to create and access Web content." in: 1.3 Role of authoring tools in Web accessibility. I think "ability" is about "talent". Suggestion: use, for example, the word "possibility". "Everyone should have the possibility to create and access Web content." Regards ciao ~ pasquale Il giorno 15/dic/05, alle ore 06:26, Judy Brewer ha scritto: > > The following is a DRAFT of some of our first EOWG comments on WCAG > 2.0. Please review these, and comment and/or add information for > our teleconference this Friday. > > Thanks, > > - Judy >
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 14:09:59 UTC