- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:57:40 -0400
- To: Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu>, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Wayne, At 08:01 AM 6/17/2005 -0700, Wayne Dick wrote: >Regarding the bad sites: They should look really good to their intended >audience. They may be coded badly from a technical or accessibility >standpoint, but they should look good in the intended mode. > >Also, the good site should look as much like the original site as >possible. When my campus fixed many of our accessibility issues the web >masters took the opportunity to make general changes in the UI. The >result was that all the mistakes made in the UI change were blamed on >accessibility. > >We need to communicate that accessible and aesthetically stunning are >compatible. My motto is: accessibility without compromise. I think that this is what we were aiming at, but I'll try to make it clearer in the requirements document. Thanks, - Judy >Wayne -- Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530 32 Vassar Street Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 24 June 2005 04:10:27 UTC