W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: [Draft] Requirements for Before/After Web Site Retrofitting Demo

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:29:11 -0700
Message-ID: <42B1D307.6060702@gorge.net>
To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

As I get further into this it would seem that the original "R" in the 
acronym "EARL" (Evaluation & Repair Language) might be what is intended 
to become "retrofit" instead of "repair"???

Once the agreement is reached that "retrofit" is appropriate in the 
context of repairing an accessibility-broken Web site, then we can go 
ahead on. I just don't see it as a better word, but in the end it 
doesn't matter if the sites get repaired or retrofitted as long as they 
get fixed.

Am I missing something, or did I miss where the decision to use 
"retrofit" in place of "repair" came about? If it's already been 
decided, fine.

Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 19:29:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:37 UTC