- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:29:11 -0700
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
As I get further into this it would seem that the original "R" in the acronym "EARL" (Evaluation & Repair Language) might be what is intended to become "retrofit" instead of "repair"??? Once the agreement is reached that "retrofit" is appropriate in the context of repairing an accessibility-broken Web site, then we can go ahead on. I just don't see it as a better word, but in the end it doesn't matter if the sites get repaired or retrofitted as long as they get fixed. Am I missing something, or did I miss where the decision to use "retrofit" in place of "repair" came about? If it's already been decided, fine. Love.
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 19:29:15 UTC