- From: <michaeka@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:21:01 -0700
- To: shawn@w3.org, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Hello, EOWG - Here's some comments about the images: IMAGE #1 under the How the Components Relate header (showing interrelationships among developers, tools, content, browsers/etc., and users): Is the ALT attribute for this image useful for the visually disabled? It is a lot of text for a screen reader to render. I feel the text content should convey all the meaning for non-visual users. The image is a visual alternative to the text content for people who process information visually. IMAGE #2 under the Interdependencies Between Components header(showing information about ALT attribute): I find this image very confusing, with too much information. Does it really add value? Would an image accompanied by the correct ALT attribute code help? IMAGE #3 under the When One Component is Weak header (showing breaks in developer, tools, etc. interrelationships): Same comment as for Image #1. I think the concept would be clearer if the image was exactly the same as Image #1, except for 1) the lines between developer/tools/content and users/browsers, etc./content could be dashed and 2) the dashed lines and the tools and browse/etc. computer images could be grayed out. Then add solid black arrows from developers to content and from users to content. Do not have three computer images for browsers/etc., and don't have white zigzags through the computer images. IMAGE #4 under the Guidelines for Components (adding information about guidelines and technical specifications): Same comment as for Image #1. The accompanying text states that "These guidelines ...are developed in coordination with W3C technical specifications" whereas the illustration implies a hierarchical relationship between specs and guidelines, as the specs are shown below the guidelines - i.e., a different relationship from "in coordination." Regards, Blossom
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 00:21:36 UTC