- From: Shawn Lawton Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 17:53:09 -0600
- To: "'Sailesh Panchang'" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>, <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000001c3a3f7$f73c9c60$08827544@SLHenry>
1. Another approach to implement Natasha's idea is to clearly distinguishbenefits under two headings along the lines of: - increased audience reach among PWD/AT users/seniors ... the category that is supposed to benefit from WCAG etc. So the later half of the content under "Increased site use" can be moved here. - increase general Website usability SLH: done 2. I suppose the words "In addition to the direct cost benefits addressed above, can be dropped. SLH: left for now as transition. will revisit during later editing. 3. It is not appropriate to say "realize direct and indirect cost benefits ". Suggest that it be replaced with "realize direct and indirect financial benefits " in "most organizations realize direct and indirect cost benefits from increased Web site use." SLH: yup, I caught that even before i read your mail 4. Consider adding customer support services as an example under the para that begins "Increasingly, Web sites are used to cut costs...". SLH: added 5. Another term for effective usage: intense use / encouraged to explore the site's features / offerings. SLH: added "use the site more thoroughly," 6. Need to include following as a benefit: SLH: Should be covered in detail in Technical Factors, and is referenced here as: "Decreases the cost of upgrading to new technologies in the future, as a foundation for future Web" (Outreach: Last week at a corporate presentation I was at, the company's top execs just bought the "right thing to do" argument as they perceived it was in line with their values, leadership position and their image as a customer/market responsive / friendly company.) SLH: cool. interesting. Thanks, Sailesh ! ~ Shawn
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 18:56:22 UTC