- From: Chuck Letourneau <cpl@starlingweb.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 12:16:07 -0400
- To: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>, EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020626120526.00afc800@host.igs.net>
Hi Harvey, I have attempted to incorporate (most of) your suggestions into the Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility document. See Section 4 at http://www.starlingweb.com/wai/eval2.htm#dynamic I added them as sub bullets under (I think) the appropriate bullets. However, I am not entirely sure this level of detail is appropriate for this document. Perhaps the group could discuss this on the Wednesday or Friday call. Regards, Chuck At 14/06/02 09:58 AM, Harvey Bingham wrote: >Here are some thoughts on assessment of dynamically generated page content: > >1. Does the content of every dynamically generated page have consistent >content >with respect to accessibility? If so a single sample can suffice. If not, seek >consistent classes that represent these differences for testing? > >2. Does generated content drawn from database meet accessibility >requirements for >all images, alt texts, and if needed the longdesc? [require these in >database.] > >3. Does the generated tab order from the template allow getting to the >generated text >content effectively? > >4. Do generated data tables have accessibility aids: captions, ids on th >header cells >and axis idrefs in th data cells? > >5. If generated video, is it captioned? > >6. If generated audio narrative, is textual equivalent available? > >Regards/Harvey Bingham >
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 12:17:17 UTC