- From: <Andrew_Arch@visionaustralia.org.au>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:11:51 +1100
- To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Dear All, In our workshops we have still been promoting the use of the "D" link for complex graphics explanations, however when I recently checked back to the Techniques document: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#long-descriptions ==================== 7.2.1 Invisible d-links Note. Invisible d-links are deprecated in favor of the "longdesc" attribute. An invisible d-link is a small (1-pixel) or transparent image whose "alt" attribute value is "D-link" or "D" and is part of the content of an A element. Like other d-links, it refers to a text equivalent of the associated image. Like other links, users can tab to it. Invisible d-links thus provide a (temporary) solution for designers who wish to avoid visible d-links for stylistic reasons. ==================== It appears that visible "D" links are still acceptable, but the invisible "D" link is not. (In which case, can anyone point me to a definitive list of "user agents" (or versions) that do/don't support "longdesc"?) I am then curious as to why visible "D" links are recommended as a technique but not invisible ones - a screen-reader doesn't differentiate! Thanks, Andrew _________________________________ Andrew Arch Vision Australia Foundation http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2001 22:16:53 UTC