W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2001

longdesc vs D-link query

From: <Andrew_Arch@visionaustralia.org.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:11:51 +1100
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Message-ID: <4A256A2B.000C2D8D.00@gw002.tnpn.net.au>

Dear All,

In our workshops we have still been promoting the use of the "D" link for
complex graphics explanations, however when I recently checked back to the
Techniques document: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#long-descriptions

7.2.1 Invisible d-links

       Note. Invisible d-links are deprecated in favor of the "longdesc"

       An invisible d-link is a small (1-pixel) or transparent image whose "alt"
attribute value is "D-link" or "D" and is
       part of the content of an A element. Like other d-links, it refers to a
text equivalent of the associated image. Like
       other links, users can tab to it. Invisible d-links thus provide a
(temporary) solution for designers who wish to
       avoid visible d-links for stylistic reasons.

It appears that visible "D" links are still acceptable, but the invisible "D"
link is not. (In which case, can anyone point me to a definitive list of "user
agents" (or versions) that do/don't support "longdesc"?) I am then curious as to
why visible "D" links are recommended as a technique but not invisible ones - a
screen-reader doesn't differentiate!

Thanks,  Andrew
Andrew Arch
Vision Australia Foundation
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2001 22:16:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:31 UTC