- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:16:05 -0700
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20000929070048.00a6b6e0@mail.gorge.net>
At 12:00 AM 9/29/00 -0400, Judy Brewer wrote: >one-line "perspectives" on things to highlight from different trainers As I tried to point out at the end of the call today there are two dominant sub-texts informing most (all?) the trainers' perspectives: Demystification Demythification By using examples already familiar to the audience (when possible/applicable) funneled through a (frequently) unfamiliar medium (screen reader, lynx) the mystery is made less imposing. By exploding myths (can't have graphics, must be all text, etc.) the opposition (based on fears of creativity-impairment) is spiked. For many "lay" audiences the QuickTips need a geek-to-everyday language translation (what the hell's a "tag"?) so a handout that counters the most frequent myths about the difficulty/expense/ugliness of accessibility measures could be an effective supplement. So many audiences might "get it" if they had concrete evidence of sites that worked in lynx, with screen readers, and for those seeking an abundance of "cool". Our own sites are bland to the latter group so mere verbal protestations that "you don't have to 'dumb down' a site to make it accessible" meet with a "yeah, RIGHT! - then why is your site so dull?" -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Friday, 29 September 2000 10:17:35 UTC