W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Reminder, EOWG Meeting, Friday April 28, 2000

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 15:22:20 -0400 (EDT)
To: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0004281520150.13812-100000@tux.w3.org>

good comments about the feedback to the guidelines groups - this is an
important benefit we can get from doing reviews.

The tool DanBri and I have been developing for tracking conformance by using
metadata could be readinly adapted to work as you suggest - if I get time to
play with it in the next week or so I'll make the changes (they are fairly

Charles McCN

On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:

  Hi Judy!
  Sorry, I need to go to another meeting with my visitors and I thought I'll
  be just disturbing if I come for 30 minutes. So here are some comments about
  Good document, I liked it!
  I think, it would be good if reviewers could also state somewhere if they
  had some problems or were unsure of some things e.g. of how to interprete a
  specific guideline. This would give us more feedback on problems areas of
  the WCAG and also encourage other reviewers to look more carefully some
  specific issues.
  Also when testing with actual users it would be good to know exactly what
  kinds of users with what devices doing what kinds of tasks in what
  environments where tested (could be a link to a detailed description).
  Could we have a way to add metadata to the info so we could easily add the
  results together e.g. if somebody has not tested speech input or only
  looked the WAI guidelines they could submit there partial results and then
  users sould easily select if they want to look results from the same
  reviewer or WCAG checklist results or only all the actual user test
  results, or look where the reviewers had most problems.
  At 12:23 AM 4/27/00 -0400, Judy Brewer wrote:
  >Reminder, EOWG Meeting, Friday April 28, 2000
  >	8:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m. US Eastern
  >	Phone bridge at +1.617.252.1038
  >Preliminary Agenda:
  >	[* Please review http://www.w3.org/2000/04/wareview 
  >	and comment on list before meeting, BUT also look over 
  >	the background materials first, and the discussion 
  >	notes from EOWG meeting after CSUN.]
  >1. Outreach Updates
  >2. Discussion of Review Process draft
  >- reminder of background materials
  >	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/Review
  >	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/Gallery.html
  >- new ROUGH draft to look over
  >	http://www.w3.org/2000/04/wareview
  >	based on discussion at EOWG face-to-face meeting
  >	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2000/0326-eowg-min.html#review
  >3. More discussion on Training Page
  >	http://www.w3.org/WAI/training/
  >Talk to you soon,
  >- Judy
  >Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
  >Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
  >World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
  >MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA

Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia 
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 15:22:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:29 UTC