correction to previous post. It should read: I've reviewed the information on the present situation with regard to formation of an ua faq and have a couple of suggestions as described below: would it be a good idea to take a look at the guidelines to q & a about? for example, guideline 1. The abstract has some good stuff to chop up into and perhaps the documentation section should be emphasized as well. as a member of the ua working group, I'd be happy to play a participatory role in this process. Thanks! -- Hands-On Technolog(eye)s ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://poehlman.clark.net mailto:poehlman@clark.net voice 301-949-7599 end sig.Received on Friday, 14 April 2000 11:24:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:29 UTC