- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:10:10 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
I think this document is really coming along! Lots of good info. A few comments: the title "How Different Disabilities Affect Access to the Web" might be easier to read as, "How access to the Web is affected by different disabilities." There seem to be some formatting errors. I don't think the bullets under a few of the disabilities should be highlighted. For example, the bullets following "Barriers that people with blindness may encounter on the Web include:" are bolded. "Alternate keyboards or switches" needs to include people with cognitive, or neurological disabilities as well as a couple other types of keyboards like so: Hardware or software devices, used by people with physical, cognitive, or neurological disabilities, that provide an alternate way of creating keystrokes that appear to come from the standard keyboard. Examples include on-screen keyboards, eyegaze keyboards, large key keyboards, symbolic keyboards and sip-and-puff switches. Applications that can be operated entirely from the standard keyboard , with no mouse movements required, support single-switch access or access via alternative keyboards. In the description of "Scanning Software" do we need to be more specific about the different types of scanning? The "cross-hair" method doesn't seem to fit in this definition, although it *could*. By cross-hair I mean the kind where you have a horizontal line that moves down the screen (like RJ Cooper's crossScanner). when you press a switch, it stops and a vertical line then starts moving left to right until you press the switch again. The item selected is the one at the intersection of the two lines. There are also other methods that I am less familiar with. In the scenarios.. I suggest at least one scenario for each time of assistive technology used. Currently there are no scenarios for alternative keyboards, switches, or scanning software. I think just one more scenario would be good. this sentence is a little hard to understand: "She uses the speech output for rapid review of the text in a document, and has become accustomed to listening to the speech output at a speed that her co-workers cannot understand at all." perhaps, "has become accustomed to listening to speech at a speed so fast that her co workers can not understand it at all." ?? "Suddenly Kam finds that he has no idea what up to half of the instructional material is about, and his performance in the class starts to slip." might be easier to read as "Suddenly Kam finds that he has no idea what most of the instructional material is about, and his performance in the class starts to slip." "Then she sends the URI of the virtual tour to friends, to see if they share her interest in trying a particularly good-looking new restaurant downtown that weekend." use "interesting sounding" instead of "good-looking."
Received on Monday, 25 October 1999 14:09:23 UTC