- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 13:11:22 -0500 (EST)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
I think that the principles given are the complete set, although I have a nagging feeling I forgot one. So I am expecting at most one more similar instance. I expect some participation from the audience - people who write applications are not fools, although by and large they have never run across accessibility (any more than the people we cite in the 'explain accessibility in help files' checkpoint). I think what we are striving for is a document which can be read and give somebody a terse but accurate explanation of what needs to be done. I think we should also outline some strategies which could be used, but I would prefer them to be in a separate techniques document. Charles On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, William Loughborough wrote: CMcCN: " I feel that something along these lines justifies the volume it adds to the document." WL:: How many similar instances are proposed? Enough to warrant yet another document? Or perhaps a major expansion of the Introduction? Need guidelines serve as be-all/end-all exemplars of completeness or can we assume some participation from the audience? --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 1999 13:11:29 UTC