Re: WAI card - Font Size

        Reply to:   RE>>WAI card - Font Size 

I agree with Charles (in this case, anyway), although I think the font and the amount of white space used on the pilot version makes the card quite readable already.

geoff/ncam

--------------------------------------
Date: 2/1/99 3:45 PM
To: Geoff Freed
From: Charles McCathieNevile
Bigger is better.

in this case, anyway

Charles

On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Daniel Dardailler wrote:

  
  I would really like people to give opinion on the font size choice.
  

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA


------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by wgbh.org with ADMIN;1 Feb 1999 15:43:29 U
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by www19.w3.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) id PAA11596;
	Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:33:23 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:33:23 -0500 (EST)
Resent-Message-Id: <199902012033.PAA11596@www19.w3.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: tux.w3.org: charles owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:33:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
To: dd@w3.org
cc: WAI EO <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <199902011742.SAA22388@www47.inria.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9902011532310.26535-100000@tux.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: WAI card - Font Size 
Resent-From: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org> archive/latest/390
X-Loop: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Sender: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org
Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org
Precedence: list

Received on Monday, 1 February 1999 15:50:39 UTC