- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 15:15:38 +0100
- To: love26@gorge.net
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
> I think that since this is mostly for an intro and entirely in English > that it's OK to leave out the part about LANG. Well, there are some very strong proponent of LANG as a P1 in the GL group, so I would remove it lightly. > I still don't think the word "attribute" is ever necessary. I still > believe that some type-face semantics will get the point across. Somehow I'm afraid some people will look for a ALT or LANG element, not find it, and drop the case. > When I made my card at http://dicomp.pair.com/card.htm I moved the > "Quick HTML..." and "Guidelines..." up so that they were between the > logos and this enables at least 4 items on obverse side. It is > conceivable that if the title is "Quick HTML tips for Web accessibility" > that this phrase could be in *10 POINT* thus looking more like a real > title. The sub-head might be "See www.w3.org/wai for details" If you look at the gifs, you'll see that we can hardly put both the title and the pointer between the logos. > 5 Links Use meaningfull link text. No "Click Here". I really like this > one. It's actually "meaningful". Charles doesn't. I'm neutral. Others ? > "Have data make sense when read cell by cell." > "Make cell by cell reading sensible." Do you mean to say you prefer cell rather than line or that the second version is shorter ? or both ?
Received on Monday, 1 February 1999 09:15:48 UTC