- From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocadu.ca>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:51:46 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2014/01/27-au-minutes.html Full text: WAI AU 27 Jan 2014 Agenda See also: IRC log Attendees Present Jan, Jeanne, Jutta, Tim_Boland Regrets Alastair_C., Tim_B._(partial), Alex_L. Chair Jutta Treviranus Scribe Jan Contents Topics 2. Candidate Recommendation (CR) process update 1. Review of UAAG 2.0 Last Call 2. Candidate Recommendation (CR) process update 3. Gathering and building the SEVEN "Tools and Resources Needed for Testing ATAG 2.0 Success Criteria:" 4. The group will cooperate on a full test of a tool to get a sanity check on our testing procedure 5. Implementation report update (Jan) 6. Re-chartering update 7. Other issues? Summary of Action Items 2. Candidate Recommendation (CR) process update JS: MC has finished adding the ATAG layer but needs to ensure W3C security policies are met ... No ETA yet 1. Review of UAAG 2.0 Last Call JT: We could assign someone... JR: I'm on the UAWG group JS: I'm staff contact on that group ... Should review ATAG reference section JR: I could create msg pointing people to UAAG sections TB: I'm swamped at the moment JR: I will do this JS: The deadline is this Friday Jan 31 ... If we knew it was coming, we could grant an extension ... Just send email to Jim A, Kelly F, Jeanne S with date JT: Can you please relay that info JS: Yes 2. Candidate Recommendation (CR) process update JT: JS already updated us above...there will be an email blast to the community asking for people to test ... On w3c site, lists, etc. ... Stressing importance of ATAG 3. Gathering and building the SEVEN "Tools and Resources Needed for Testing ATAG 2.0 Success Criteria:" JT: Volunteers? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2014JanMar/0005.html JR: I can help with 4, 5 TB: Maybe I can 1, would like to discuss offline JR: Web evaluation methodology? TB: There is a new versions JR: If we can grab something already made. ... is it realistic? TB: I can look at it JR: Jeanne? JS: I hate to say I'll do it... ... I'll be working on test harness TB: Donated tests JR: I will look into it ... Deque, WebAIM, Gunderson's group, AChecker JT: Wondering if some could be assigned to students JR: 2. Platform Accessibility Service Test Procedure... would be a very nice project (all desktop and mobile OS's) 4. The group will cooperate on a full test of a tool to get a sanity check on our testing procedure JR: Need tools first 5. Implementation report update (Jan) JR: No update 6. Re-chartering update JS: Judy still working on it. 7. Other issues? TB: Who's going to CSUN ... I'm going...will talk abnout wcag scoring methodology JS: Will be there talking about atag > -----Original Message----- > From: Richards, Jan [mailto:jrichards@ocadu.ca] > Sent: January-26-14 11:49 PM > To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org > Subject: AUWG Teleconference for 27 January > > There will be an AUWG teleconference on Monday 27 January 2014 at > 1:00pm- 2:00 pm ET: > Call: (617) 761-6200 ext. 2894# > Zakim: +1.617.761.6200 (Boston) > IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #au > > If people think they will arrive more than 15 minutes late, please send me an > email beforehand. > > Most Recent Editors Drafts > ===================== > > ATAG 2.0 > http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/ATAG20/ > > Implementing ATAG 2.0 > http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20/ > > Test Resources: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013OctDec/att- > 0043/ATAG2-CR-Tests-20131206.html > (to be posted later in AU space) > > Implementation Report: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013OctDec/att- > 0043/ATAG2ImplementationReport20131206.html > (to be posted later at > http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2013/ATAG2ImplementationReport.html) > > > Agenda > ====== > > 1. Review of UAAG 2.0 Last Call > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2013OctDec/0050.html > > 2. Candidate Recommendation (CR) process update > -Testing harness progress (Jeanne) > > 3. Gathering and building the SEVEN "Tools and Resources Needed for > Testing ATAG 2.0 Success Criteria:" > - By the next call (Jan. 20), please decide which (at least one) of these you > want to help put together (and for which technology e.g. HTML v?). > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2014JanMar/0005.html > > 4. The group will cooperate on a full test of a tool to get a sanity check on our > testing procedure. > - On the call we decided to look at the online TinyMCE demo > (http://www.tinymce.com/tryit/full.php) since it is widely used but > reasonably small. > > 5. Implementation report update (Jan) > > - Please send in your additions/edits in the following format: > SC#-Level-Product-Status > E.g. A.1.1.1-LevelA-Drupal-Yes > > 6. Re-chartering update > > 7. Other issues? > > Cheers, > Jan > -- > > (MR) JAN RICHARDS > PROJECT MANAGER > INCLUSIVE DESIGN RESEARCH CENTRE (IDRC) > OCAD UNIVERSITY > > T 416 977 6000 x3957 > F 416 977 9844 > E jrichards@ocadu.ca >
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 18:52:19 UTC