- From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:08:12 -0400
- To: AUWG <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I am forwarding these responses to the list so that they are archived. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Response to your comments on Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0 Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 22:31:43 +0000 From: Alex Li <alli@microsoft.com> To: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org> CC: Jutta Treviranus <jtreviranus@faculty.ocad.ca>, Cherie Ekholm <cheriee@exchange.microsoft.com>, Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com> Hi Jeanne and Jutta, Thank you for the response to our comments. Microsoft will consider them carefully. Please note that some of our key groups team are rather tied up at the moment. It is likely that we will send you our review around mid to late September instead of Aug 26 per request. I believe Cherie already informed the group about this scheduling issue. Thus, I ask the working group not to assume that Microsoft accepts the response with no additional follow up questions or comment upon Aug 26. I hope you understand that Microsoft intends on giving the working group's response a comprehensive consideration and adequate time and devotion is necessary. All best, Alex Li Senior Strategist Microsoft Trustworthy Computing Group email: alli@microsoft.com phone: +1 (425)538-7984 mobile: +1 (206) 778-4202 Microsoft Corporation -----Original Message----- From: Jeanne Spellman [mailto:jeanne@w3.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:32 AM To: Alex Li Cc: Jutta Treviranus Subject: Response to your comments on Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0 Dear Alex: Thank you for your comments on the 8 July 2010 Last Call Working Draft of Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ATAG20-20100708/). The Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the draft. We would like to know whether we have understood your comments correctly and whether you are satisfied with our resolutions. Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to us by 26 August 2011 to say whether you accept them or to discuss additional concerns you have with our response. If we do not hear from you by that date, we will mark your comment as "no response" and close it. If you need more time to consider your acknowledgement, please let us know. You can respond by email to public-atag2-comments@w3.org. Note that this list is publicly archived. Since many of the comments were related, we have kept all the comments on a topic together in a spreadsheet format, so you can see your comments in the context of the others. You can search for your specific comments by searching for your code "MS". The spreadsheet of comments is located at http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/atag20-8Jul10LC-comments-updated14july2011.html The AUWG has published a new working draft of ATAG 2.0 and Implementing ATAG 2.0, so you can see the results of your comments in the document. http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-ATAG20-20110721/ Note that if you still strongly disagree with our resolution on an issue, you have the opportunity to file a formal objection (according to 3.3.2 of the W3C Process, at http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGArchiveMinorityViews) to public-atag2-comments@w3.org. Formal objections will be reviewed during the candidate recommendation transition meeting with the W3C Director, unless we can come to agreement with you on a resolution in advance of the meeting. Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we cannot always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the comments are valuable to the development of ATAG 2.0. Regards, Jutta Treviranus, AUWG Chair Jeanne Spellman, AUWG Staff Contact
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 14:08:32 UTC