Fwd: Re: Response to your comments on Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Response to your comments on Authoring Tool Accessibility 
Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:24:27 -0400
From: Greg Gay <greggay@rogers.com>
Reply-To: ggay@ocad.ca
Organization: Ontario College of Art and Design
To: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>

Thanks Jeanne
I'm satisfied with the responses.

greg


On 11-07-27 01:21 PM, Jeanne Spellman wrote:
> Dear Greg:
>
> Thank you for your comments on the 8 July 2010 Last Call Working Draft
> of Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ATAG20-20100708/). The Authoring Tool
> Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has reviewed all comments
> received on the draft. We would like to know whether we have
> understood your comments correctly and whether you are satisfied with
> our resolutions.
>
> Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to
> us by 26 August 2011 to say whether you accept them or to discuss
> additional concerns you have with our response. If we do not hear from
> you by that date, we will mark your comment as "no response" and close
> it. If you need more time to consider your acknowledgement, please let
> us know. You can respond by email to public-atag2-comments@w3.org.
> Note that this list is publicly archived.
>
> Since many of the comments were related, we have kept all the comments
> on a topic together in a spreadsheet format, so you can see your
> comments in the context of the others.  You can search for your
> specific comments by searching for your code "GG". The spreadsheet of
> comments is located at
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/atag20-8Jul10LC-comments-updated14july2011.html
>
>
> The AUWG has published a new working draft of ATAG 2.0 and
> Implementing ATAG 2.0, so you can see the results of your comments in
> the document.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-ATAG20-20110721/
>
> Note that if you still strongly disagree with our resolution on an
> issue, you have the opportunity to file a formal objection (according
> to 3.3.2 of the W3C Process, at
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGArchiveMinorityViews)
> to public-atag2-comments@w3.org. Formal objections will be reviewed
> during the candidate recommendation transition meeting with the W3C
> Director, unless we can come to agreement with you on a resolution in
> advance of the meeting.
>
> Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we
> cannot always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the
> comments are valuable to the development of ATAG 2.0.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Jutta Treviranus, AUWG Chair
> Jeanne Spellman, AUWG Staff Contact


-- 
Greg Gay
Project Manager
Inclusive Design Research Centre
OCAD University
416 977-6000 #3956

Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 12:59:35 UTC