- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:28:36 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Thanks to Barry and Roberto for your responses to our poll #1. For those issues that have been fully accepted, I'll just wait for a third response (Jutta, Gregg, Tim?) to process them. For those issues that Barry made suggestions for, I'll be responding later today or on Monday (I'm currently attending a conference) Cheers, Jan Quoting Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>: > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Jan Richards > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 10:35 PM > To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org > Subject: AUWG Poll #1: 10 September 2007 > > > So here's how an email poll might work.... > > > AUWG Poll #1: > > ----- > > Instructions: > > - Proposed rewordings, issues etc. are listed. > > - Members in good standing (http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/members) have the > following "response" options: > A: Accept the proposal > B: Accept the proposal with the changes (then specify changes) > C: Do not accept the proposal (then specify reason) > > - Once 3 people have accepted a proposal (assume my vote is to accept > unless noted) and none have rejected it, I'll start a 3 day timer. If > the timer expires with no rejections then the proposal is assumed to be > carried > > - to keep things organized, please respond to the poll as a whole rather > than to individual questions. > > ----- > > Start of proposals: > > Proposal 1: Components of Web Accessibility wording > http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070821/WD-ATAG20-20070821.html#int > ro-components > > Response: Accept. > > ----- > > Proposal 2: Moving the "Organization of the ATAG 2.0 Document" section > up above the guidelines as it is in WCAG 2.0 > http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070821/WD-ATAG20-20070821.html#int > ro-organization > > Response: Accept. > > ----- > > Proposal 3: The "modified" text in "Relationship to the Web Content > Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)" > http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070821/WD-ATAG20-20070821.html#Rel > ationship-To-WCAG > > Response: Accept. > > ----- > > Proposal 4: Modified definition of "authoring action", "authoring > outcome", "authoring practice" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JulSep/0038.html > > Response: Accept. > > ----- > > Proposal 5: Definition of "authoring session " > http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070821/WD-ATAG20-20070821.html#def > initions > > Response: Accept. > > ----- > > Proposal 6: Modified definition of "authoring tool", "view" (which would > then contain "editing view" and "preview"), and "authoring tool user > interface" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JulSep/0040.html > PLUS see below for modification to "authoring tool" > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JulSep/0043.html > > Response: Accept. > > ----- > > > End of Poll #1 > > > Cheers, > Jan > > > >
Received on Friday, 14 September 2007 13:29:18 UTC