Re: [w3c-wai-au] <none>

I think your proposal would be a positive change, but what about putting 
the "conformance" section up front in the document (before the guideline 
descriptions), because a conformance overview is what people might want to know 
about first and it would set the context for reading the detailed guidelines 
later?

Just a thought..

Best, Tim

 Quoting Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>:

> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> What if in "How the guidelines are organized" we reworded:
> 
> "Success criteria for testing whether the guideline has been satisfied. 
> (normative)"
> 
> TO:
> 
> "*Success criteria* for testing whether the guideline has been 
> satisfied. The success criteria are each assigned one of three (3) 
> levels. (normative)"
> 
> *Success criteria* would link down to the "Success Criteria" section 
> under "Conformance".
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Cheers,
> Jan
> 
> 
> 
> boland@nist.gov wrote:
> > Hi, I notice that in the latest ATAG2.0 Editor's Draft [1], 
> > following "A.1.1", "Level A", "Level AA", and "Level AAA" terms are used.
> > I could not find a description/definition of these terms in-line before 
> > encountering "A.1.1".  If there isn't such a definition/description, should
> 
> > there be, so that when readers encounter these terms, they know what they 
> > signify/mean?
> > 
> > Thanks and best wishes
> > Tim Boland NIST
> >   
> > 
> > [1]:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/WD-ATAG20-20070813/WD-ATAG20-20070813.html
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Jan Richards, M.Sc.
> User Interface Design Specialist
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
> Faculty of Information Studies
> University of Toronto
> 
>    Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
>    Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
>    Phone: 416-946-7060
>    Fax:   416-971-2896
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 14:36:27 UTC