Re: Starter comments on WCAG 2.0 draft from Tim Boland on 2005-08-01 (w3c-wai-au@w3.org from July to September 2005)

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:09:51 -0400
To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Cc: "List (WAI-AUWG)" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20050801120512.01ec93c8@mailserver.nist.gov>

At 02:00 PM 7/25/2005 -0400, Jan Richards wrote:

>COMMENT: Remember, ATAG conformant tools don't require WCAG conformance, 
>they just enable and support it.

How is the excepted comment consistent with the language in "relative 
priority checkpoints"
of Section 2.1.2 of the reworked ATAG2.0 specification [1]   (perhaps I'm 
misunderstanding the comment..)?

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

[1]: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/guidelines.html

Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 16:10:29 UTC