Starter comments on WCAG 2.0 draft

On the last call Jutta asked everyone to have a look at the new WCAG 2.0 
draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WCAG20-20050630/) so that we can 
compile a list of comments from AUWG.

Here is a start:

---

Notes on WCAG 2.0:

[1] WCAG Editorial Note: We are currently looking at how to handle 
unknown or community-contributed, authored units that are created using 
an aggregator supplied tool. We are currently considering whether 
aggregated content would be judged to conform to WCAG if the aggregator 
supplied tool can conform to the authoring tools accessibility 
guidelines (ATAG) 2.0.

COMMENT: Remember, ATAG conformant tools don’t require WCAG conformance, 
they just enable and support it.


[2] WCAG Authoring Tools section

COMMENT: Meets our request.


[3] Validity debate:

COMMENT: My personal view is that validity is probably not “necessary 
for a minimum level of accessibility” (i.e. a level 1 success criteria 
item), but perhaps should be retained at a higher level.


[4] Technology assumptions and the "baseline"

- Having a number of pre-set baseline scenarios might make the tool's 
job easier as it decides which parts of WCAG to enforce,

- It might be useful to examine how ATAG's "technology-specific WCAG 
benchmark document" integrates with the "baseline".

---

Cheers,
Jan

Received on Monday, 25 July 2005 18:01:29 UTC