- From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:43:08 -0400
- To: "List (WAI-AUWG)" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <p06020418bda85b4e7a83@[142.150.154.170]>
Here are my current attempts at editing 3.1 and 4.3, I still want to work on it but thought it would be good to get some additional creative participation. Jutta 3.1 Prompt and assist the author to create content that conforms to WCAG. [Web Content Checkpoints Relative to WCAG] Rationale: Appropriate assistance should increase the likelihood that typical authors will create content that conforms to WCAG. This assistance should help to prevent the author from making decisions or omissions that cause accessibility problems. If accessibility problems are prevented, less effort is required to create content that conforms to WCAG. Different tool developers will accomplish this goal in ways that are appropriate to their products, processes, and authors. Techniques: Implementation Techniques for Checkpoint 3.1 Success Criteria: 1. When content is added that requires information from the author in order to conform to WCAG, then the authoring tool must inform the author that this additional information is required (e.g. via input dialogs, interactive feedback, etc.). (determine level) 2. If the authoring tool provides guidance then that guidance should direct the author to use authoring practices that are most likely to lead to Web content that conforms to WCAG. 3. When the author is presented with a list of choices, that includes choices of formats or authoring practices that do not support content that conforms to WCAG, these should be marked to indicate that the choice may produce content that is inaccessible. 4.3. Ensure that the author is encouraged to consider accessibility throughout the authoring process in any feature that assists the author in sequencing actions. [Priority 2] Rationale: Accessible design as an afterthought or separate process is much more onerous and therefore costly than when accessibility is considered from the start. If the authoring tool supports the author in considering accessibility before and/or during the authoring process it is more likely that accessible authoring practices will become a common practice. This is analogous to internationalization, which is much easier when it is considered from the beginning rather than handled last. Techniques: Implementation Techniques for Checkpoint 4.3 Success Criteria: 1. Any feature that helps to sequence author actions (eg., templates, wizards, tutorials, instruction text) must integrate accessibility prompting. These prompts should occur before or at the time that the author is required to make the authoring decision related to the prompt.
Received on Friday, 29 October 2004 23:45:50 UTC