- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:15:00 -0400
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
I'm working on all my action items.. I'm interested in getting the "projects review" started. Is there anything I can do to help move this along? At 05:06 PM 7/28/2004 -0400, you wrote: >Hi everyone, > >Since the so-called easy [E] AUWG work items are due on Monday I thought >I'd put out a summary of how things are going. Please let me know if there >are any omissions here. If any items need more time (as some have noted) >please report this to the list: > >======================================================= >DUE DATES: > >VE: Very Easy - 19 July 2004 >E: Easy - 2 August 2004 >H: Hard - 16 August 2004 > >======================================================= >DONE: > >• 4.3 (TIMING success criteria re-write) JT [VE] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2004JulSep/0030.html >[Follow thread] > >• ALL TECHS: THERE IS NO CAN, THERE IS ONLY DO, + lose “consider” >wording JR,MM,TB,GP [E] >• Making minor changes to ATAG MM, JR [E] >• General re-formatting of techniques MM, JR [E] >http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech1.html >http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech2.html >http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech3.html >http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech4.html > >• 3.1.1 Examples x2 JR [E] >http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech3.html >[See 3.1.1(6) and (7)] > >• 4.2, success_criteria 3: JR to produce techs that mirror structure in >4.4. [E] >http://jan.rcat.utoronto.ca/public/auwg/tech4.html > >• Go over Config checkpoint (checkpoint 4.5) TB [] >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2004JulSep/0034.html > >======================================================== >STILL TO DO: > >• CMS template example JR, JT [E] > >• 3.1.1(15): Prompting and assisting for device independent handlers >MM [H] >[NOTE CHANGE IN DIFFICULTY] > >• 3.1.1(11) - Prompting and assisting for document structure GP, KM, >BF(?)[H] >[NOTE CHANGE IN DIFFICULTY] > >• 2 Illustrations in 4.3 JR [H] >[NOTE CHANGE IN DIFFICULTY] > >• 3.1.1(10) Prompting and assisting for Metadata- disguised screenshot >of TILE JT/JR, LN [H] > >• 3.1.1(13): Prompting and assisting for style sheets TB, JR [H] > >• 3.1.1(17): Prompting and assisting for other types of accessibility >information KM [H] > >• 3.1.1(18): Prompting and assisting the author to make use of up to >date formats JR, BF(?)[H] > >• Barry to continue with work on High Level XML related techniques for >the document (with discussion on list). [H] > >=================================================== >NOT CLASSIFIED: > >• QA review of ATAG work (GL’s, techs) TB [] > >=================================================== >TEST PLAN WORK ITEMS > >1. Try to put together set of templates (what questions) that can be >used a tool - TB >2. Updating the test plan draft since several ATAG and WCAG iterations >have been made- TB >3. Update Process (administrative etc.). TB >4. “Project Review” from staff contact (MM) to W3C powers (Judy(?), Tim) >that be explaining our testing challenges MM. (timeline would be over >a month) TB volunteers to help. > >=================================================== > > >-- >Jan Richards, M.Sc. >User Interface Design Specialist >Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto > > Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca > Web: http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca > Phone: 416-946-7060 > Fax: 416-971-2896 > > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2004 09:16:35 UTC