- From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:30:25 -0400
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "List (WAI-AUWG)" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 13:52:48 UTC
Here is proposed rewording of Checkpoint 4.3, success criteria 1. Because this refers to timing and workflow, I felt that the previous success criteria did not address the need to time the accessibility functions at the appropriate time in the workflow. Suggestions, comments? Jutta New wording: Accessibility prompting must be integrated into any guidance offered to the author that assists in making authoring decisions (including templates, wizards and instructive text in dialogs). Accessibility checking, repair and documentation functions must occur before completion of the authoring workflow. Old Wording: Accessibility prompting, checking, and repair functions and documentations must occur before completion of authoring workflow. [@@note to us: this allows accessibility checking to be the last step in workflow, if necessary@@][@@wording is still flexible@@] [@@maybe we can allow authoring to define scope of workflow with input from author@@]
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 13:52:48 UTC