W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2004

Action item: success criteria

From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:30:25 -0400
Message-Id: <a0602040ebd2306202f73@[]>
To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>, "List (WAI-AUWG)" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Here is proposed rewording of Checkpoint 4.3, success criteria 1. 
Because this refers to timing and workflow, I felt that the previous 
success criteria did not address the need to time the accessibility 
functions at the appropriate time in the workflow. Suggestions, 


New wording:

Accessibility prompting must be integrated into any guidance offered 
to the author that assists in making authoring decisions (including 
templates, wizards and instructive text in dialogs). Accessibility 
checking, repair and documentation functions must occur before 
completion of the authoring workflow.

Old Wording:

Accessibility prompting, checking, and repair functions and 
documentations must occur before completion of authoring workflow. 
[@@note to us: this allows accessibility checking to be the last step 
in workflow, if necessary@@][@@wording is still flexible@@] [@@maybe 
we can allow authoring to define scope of workflow with input from 
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2004 13:52:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:49 UTC