- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:08:58 -0500
- To: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Hi Tim, For Checkpoint 3.8, I believe we intended to at least showcase ALL WCAG practices (Level 1, 2, and 3) even if the authoring tools do not yet actually support them with checking and correction, etc. It was specifically made a P2 checkpoint, so that tools could still be single-A conformant without meeting it. For Checkpoint 4.1, I think you may be right. Cheers, Jan Tim Boland wrote: > > Same issue for Checkpoint 4.1 as for Checkpoint 3.8 - see earlier message > forwarded below Tim Boland wrote: > > Additional Note: > In success criteria for checkpoint 3.8 reference is made to "meeting > requirements of WCAG" but checkpoint is listed as "priority 2" (maybe > should be relative priority instead?) . Just a note (fyi in context of > discussion at last telecon) for the future when the concept of relative > priority is reviewed. > > Best, Tim Boland NIST -- Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Web: http://ultrajuan.ic.utoronto.ca/jan/richards.html Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 17:08:53 UTC