- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:43:01 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20031112094049.0221d270@mailserver.nist.gov>
fyi W3C QA news below Best, Tim Boland NIST X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 X-Original-To: www-qa@frink.w3.org Delivered-To: www-qa@frink.w3.org Delivered-To: www-qa@w3.org From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org> To: www-qa@w3.org X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 10 Nov 2003 18:58:25 +0100 Subject: Publications of QA documents as W3C Candidate Recommendations X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/1068487111.4306.474.camel@stratustier Resent-From: www-qa@w3.org X-Mailing-List: <www-qa@w3.org> archive/latest/1318 X-Loop: www-qa@w3.org Sender: www-qa-request@w3.org Resent-Sender: www-qa-request@w3.org List-Id: <www-qa.w3.org> List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:www-qa-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe> Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:58:54 -0500 (EST) X-MailScanner: Greetings, Today, the QA Framework Specifications Guidelines were published as a W3C Candidate Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-qaframe-spec-20031110/ """The principal goal of this document is to help W3C Working Groups to write clearer, more implementable, and better testable technical reports. It provides both a common framework for specifying conformance requirements and definitions, and also addresses how a specification might allow variation among conforming implementations, both of which facilitate the generation of test materials""" Also, back in September, the QA Framework Operational Guidelines were published likewise as a W3C Candidate Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-qaframe-ops-20030922/ """A common operational framework for building conformance test materials for W3C specifications is defined. It presents operational and procedural guidelines for groups undertaking conformance materials development.""" In both cases, the Candidate Recommendation period [1] will be used by the QA WG to work in collaboration with other W3C Working Groups to seek implementation of each checkpoints at least twice, as detailed in the preliminary implementation reports: * for specGL: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/10/specgl-implementation * for OpsGl: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/09/ops-implementation Also to be noted, the QA Framework Introduction was published as a W3C Working Group Note (hence leaving the so called Recommendation track), reflecting the decision taken by the QA Working Group, based on the fact that this document does not bring normative content, and that it is more or less finished (in the sense where it does not need the focus of the Working Group) http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-qaframe-intro-20030912/ """An introduction, roadmap, and primer are presented, for a common framework for enhancing the quality practices of the W3C Working Groups in the areas of specification editing, production of test materials, and coordination of QA efforts with internal and external groups""" The Working Group is especially interested by feedback from other W3C Working Groups, but as always, feedback, comments and suggestions are welcome from anybody. Thanks, Dom 1. http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/tr.html#RecsCR -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 09:43:35 UTC