- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:57:56 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Same issue for Checkpoint 4.1 as for Checkpoint 3.8 - see earlier message forwarded below Best, Tim Boland NIST >X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 >X-Original-To: w3c-wai-au@frink.w3.org >Delivered-To: w3c-wai-au@frink.w3.org >Delivered-To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org >X-Sender: boland@mailserver.nist.gov >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 >Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 10:19:19 -0500 >To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org >From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov> >Subject: Re: New ATAG 2 and ATAG 2 Techs internal drafts >X-Archived-At: >http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.1.5.2.20031105101447.00acaf40@mailserver.nist.gov >Resent-From: w3c-wai-au@w3.org >X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org> archive/latest/3476 >X-Loop: w3c-wai-au@w3.org >Sender: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org >Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org >List-Id: <w3c-wai-au.w3.org> >List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe> >Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:19:50 -0500 (EST) >X-MailScanner: > > >Additional Note: >In success criteria for checkpoint 3.8 reference is made to "meeting >requirements of WCAG" but checkpoint is listed as "priority 2" (maybe >should be relative priority instead?) . Just a note (fyi in context of >discussion at last telecon) for the future when the concept of relative >priority is reviewed. > >Best, Tim Boland NIST > > At 12:35 PM 11/3/2003 -0800, you wrote: > >>New internal drafts of ATAG 2 have been released. I'm hoping to get Jan >>to introduce them at today's call. Here are the links: >> >>http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2003/WD-ATAG20-20031031 >>http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2003/WD-ATAG20-TECHS-20031031 >> >>- >>m >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 15:58:23 UTC