- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:40:20 -0500
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Maybe I should take #1, since I'm doing the review of the ISO document anyway as an action item. Best, Tim Boland NIST At 10:44 AM 11/5/2003 -0500, you wrote: >As per my action item, here are the ATAG technique work items. Please >volunteer for them on the list. If I've missed something, please post it >to the list. > >========================== > > >More work: > >(1) - Update techniques for guideline 1 (consider how 1.1 should be >organized if either the IBM software guidelines or the ISO document are >adopted, review the rest, asking what needs to be dropped or added?) > >(2) - Update techniques for guideline 2 (review all checkpoints, asking >what needs to be dropped or added?) > >(3) - Update techniques for guideline 3 (review reliance on WCAG >numbering in 3.1, review the rest, asking what needs to be dropped or >added?) => I WILL VOLUNTEERS FOR THIS ONE. > >(4) - Update techniques for guideline 4 (add techniques for 4.2 (4.3, >a.k.a 4.X still does not have success criteria yet), review 4.1 and 4.4, >asking what needs to be dropped or added?) > >(5) - Take a wide of the document. Is it well structured? Is it easy to >use? What is missing? > > >Less work: > >(6) - Update the references (Go through the document and adding or >correcting references as necessary, update and repair the references >page) > >(7) - Maintain the glossary (Ensure terms are up to date, keep >synchronized with glossary in guidelines, both glossaries need to >develop with an eye on other WAI and W3C glossaries) > > >============================= > > >-- >Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist >Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto > > Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca > Web: http://ultrajuan.ic.utoronto.ca/jan/richards.html > Phone: 416-946-7060 > Fax: 416-971-2896
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 11:41:02 UTC