- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:54:15 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
These would be good things to do on thursday afternoon. That fits with the existing agenda proposal. cheers Chaals On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Phill Jenkins wrote: OK. I read the section 8 on eval techniques - good start.. I would be willing to present the latest "IBM Software accessibility evaluation techniques" [not published yet] as input to the working group. And I would also like to discuss the working group's "process" for posting conformance evaluations as described on http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/reviews/ , specifically the section titled "Note about conformance reviews" Regards, Phill Jenkins, (512) 838-4517 IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center 11501 Burnet Rd, Austin TX 78758 http://www.ibm.com/able Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>@w3.org on 08/31/2001 08:38:14 PM Sent by: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org To: Giorgio Brajnik <giorgio@dimi.uniud.it> cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org> Subject: Re: Face to face agenda That is the current section * on evaluation techniques - in the current draft available as http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/WD-ATAG10-TECHS-20010801/eval And yes, we should be talking about it. cheers Chaals On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Giorgio Brajnik wrote: Charles, I would propose also a discussion aimed at producing a draft about the evaluation methodology (something we talked about in Amsterdam). Giorgio -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 23:54:18 UTC