- From: Phill Jenkins <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 22:46:16 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
OK. I read the section 8 on eval techniques - good start..
I would be willing to present the latest "IBM Software accessibility
evaluation techniques" [not published yet] as input to the working group.
And I would also like to discuss the working group's "process" for posting
conformance evaluations as described on http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/reviews/ ,
specifically the section titled "Note about conformance reviews"
Regards,
Phill Jenkins, (512) 838-4517
IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center
11501 Burnet Rd, Austin TX 78758 http://www.ibm.com/able
Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>@w3.org on 08/31/2001 08:38:14 PM
Sent by: w3c-wai-au-request@w3.org
To: Giorgio Brajnik <giorgio@dimi.uniud.it>
cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Face to face agenda
That is the current section * on evaluation techniques - in the current
draft
available as http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/WD-ATAG10-TECHS-20010801/eval
And yes, we should be talking about it.
cheers
Chaals
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Giorgio Brajnik wrote:
Charles,
I would propose also a discussion aimed at producing a draft about the
evaluation methodology (something we talked about in Amsterdam).
Giorgio
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 23:46:21 UTC