- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:11:47 -0400
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Revised Subtext idea for 5.1: This checkpoint requires that accessibility-related functionality be integrated as seamlessly as possible. At minimum, the accessibility features should not contrast with the normal operation of the tool. This means that they should be operable with approximately the same number of mouse clicks or keystrokes, the same amount of instruction , and the same degree of flexibility as other features. For example, if an element's properties are displayed in a floating toolbar, accessibility-related prompts should be added to this toolbar, not implemented as intrusive pop-up boxes. More advanced implementations might see accessibility features such as checking, integrated to the same level as analogous features unrelated to accessibility. For example, if underlining or color changes are used to notify the author, while they work, of syntax and spelling errors, accessibility problems should be similarly flagged. Revised Subtext idea for 5.2: This checkpoint requires authoring tools to have user interfaces that increase the probability that authors will use accessible authoring practices, even when less accessible alternatives are provided by the tool for reasons of completeness. At minimum, when there is an accessible and a less accessible means for performing an action, the user interface of the tool should be organized so that the accessible means is at least as visible in the user interface and at least as easy to activate in terms of mouse clicks and keystrokes than the less accessible means. More advanced solutions might purposefully impede the visibility and use of the less accessible means. Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > I think that the first one is too long, but I am not sure how to shorten it. > For the second one, I think that the minimum requirement is onyl that it is > as easy toget to the accessible techniques for doing things, not more so. > Otherwise, I like these and propose that we incorporate them. -- Cheers, Jan /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Jan Richards Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC) University of Toronto jan.richards@utoronto.ca Tel: (416) 946-7060 Fax: (416) 971-2896 /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 11:12:19 UTC