RE: "at a Minimum" (resend)

At 06:17 PM 4/27/01 -0700, Heather Swayne wrote:
>What if a company wanted to product a product that hide the fact that it 
>was producing HTML under the covers, but provided all accessible content 
>through the UI in some method

One point might be that we might "what if" ourselves to death. The chance 
that such a "product" would be possible is close enough to nil that we 
shouldn't be concerned with it.

Another point is that there's the "in the meanwhile" problem - until such a 
benevolent company actually could show that there is some undercover 
content production that is successful in: producing accessible content; 
doing so without revealing how/what the process is, there is still a need 
to check and see if that particular fox is really guarding those particular 
hens, if you take my meaning.

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE

Received on Saturday, 28 April 2001 08:39:13 UTC