- From: Heather Swayne <hswayne@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:20:10 -0700
- To: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
With regard to the proposed changes for ATAG v2. I have now talked with several Product Groups here at MS, and the general feeling is that they do not like the idea of including "at a minimum" within any of the guidelines or sub text. Some examples of their concerns: * Including text like "at a minimum could lower the bar, to allow product groups to only do that minimum level of work. As apposed to allowing individual companies to define their own minimum, or standard, that they want product groups to follow. * ATAG should not be telling product groups how to implement guidelines. The techniques document should be used to show examples of how a range of products met a given guideline. * "The minimum" for one product could be something totally different than the WAIs suggestion as the minimum, does that mean it's wrong? Even if ATAG doesn't think so, others may. * Will products have to implement "the minimum" even if they have "an advanced" solution? Heather Swayne Microsoft
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2001 11:22:11 UTC