- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 12:52:37 -0500 (EST)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Hmmm. This comes squarely under the rubric of checkpoint 7.1 - make sure the
tool is accessible. So I guess the answer is to do a survey of the different
materials for doing that, and see what they say...
Chaals
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, William Loughborough wrote:
The question of priority assignment in matters concerning the documentation
for Authoring Tools (as well as for User Agents) was unresolvedly discussed
at yesterday's telecon.
I submit that it is quite permissible for us to, if we so choose, to
recognize the important difference between the guidelines concerning the
tools themselves and the documentation one must endure in order to
install/learn/use said tools. Although for all users these latter
activities are hoop/hurdle/barrier/nuisance there is a sense in which for
PWDs the barriers presented completely preclude the ultimate experience of
the tool proper. Many other users have access to features within the tools
whose installation will be merely inconvenient but because in many cases
the mere act of uninformed/misinformed installation can cause cyberfatality
the inconvenience rises to the level of *DANGER - THIS MAY KILL YOUR
SYSTEM* because their setup is both rare and fragile.
Further the absence of criteria for reading level considerations also
precludes access to documentation for a great many people who aren't
strictly covered as "disabled".
In the light of this I propose: in regard to the documentation for
Authoring Tools (the UA can do what they want to, of course) we make it a
priority 1 requirement that access to the documentation demands that these
documents be Triple-A conformant. If they are not, then that means that the
tools package itself cannot even be Single-A conformant, which IMO is
fair/just/proper.
Obviously this cannot be retrofitted into ATAG 1.0, but there may be time
to debate/resolve/include it in our next version. If it's possible to make
a version 1.x then I think we should consider it for that.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
--
Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
September - November 2000:
W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 24 November 2000 12:52:39 UTC