Re: Techniques based on WCAG2

I did bring this up at the CG meeting last week and the general 
consensus was as Charles discussed it. If we can put the stuff into 
the structure to easily transform the document when the time comes 
(ie, when WCAG2 has matured), that would address both concerns raised.

jutta


At 1:26 PM -0500 10/31/00, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>Fulfilling Jutta's action item from teh previous meeting...
>
>Yes, we could base our techniques on WCAG 2. But that would not be directly
>helpful to people trying to conform to ATAG since the ATAG 1.0 explicitly
>requires conformance to WCAG 1.0
>
>We received the checkpoint mapping for the draft from WCAG (see mesage from
>me titled "Checkpoint Mapping beteween WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0" at
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2000OctDec/0018 for
>details) so we could fairly mechanically change the techniques that are
>assigned to a current WCAG checkpoint. But I think we might as well hold off
>until WCAG 2 is around last call, since otherwise we will end up trying to
>maintain two version of the document, and have to reorder every time WCAG
>changes their draft.
>
>Cheers
>
>Charles McCN
>
>--
>Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
>W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
>Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
>September - November 2000:
>W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis 
>Cedex, France

Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2000 13:48:05 UTC