- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:55:44 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- cc: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Jan, thanks for this - it's a good piece of work. How about we have the following categories: + Things you need to do to meet the checkpoint (these can be fairly general) + Techniques to do this (which should say how much of it they do) + Things which are good to do although they go beyond the requirements of the checkpoint. + References These probably need to be sorted (where applicable) by tool type and priority. For example to meet checkpoint 1.1 in a level-A tool, all that needs to be done is to provide source editing (and meet checkpoint 1.2 Preserve all accessibiltiy information, which can be done by not messing up the source). But for a WYSIWYG tool this will not conform to 5.1 and 5.2, so the tool cannot get to double-A. A source editing tool can use this technique to any level. Cheers Charles On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Jan Richards wrote: Hi all, Sorry I forgot to attach the file. Cheers, Jan -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia September - November 2000: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2000 12:57:44 UTC