- From: Heather Swayne <hswayne@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:16:18 -0700
- To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>, Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
I prefer Jutta's original proposal, specifically because it acknowledges that we are not using "prompt" in the way most software professionals will think of it and explains why we made this choice. Heather Swayne -----Original Message----- From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 11:52 AM To: Jutta Treviranus Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org Subject: Re: definition of "prompt" I have a few concerns about how much of this is a definition: I propose an edited version as follows: In this document "prompt" is used to mean urge, suggest, encourage. The form that this takes can be user configurable, but should not depend on the author to seek out the support, instead being initiated by the tool. Prompting is more than checking, automatically correcting, or making help and documentation available, as provided for in Guidelines 4, 5 and 6. The rest of the information is not part of a definition, but implementation advice. I think it is useful in the text of techniques, but not part of a definition. Charles McCN Prompt: In this document "prompt" does not refer to the narrow software sense of a "prompt," rather it is used as a verb meaning to urge, suggest and encourage. The form and timing that this prompting takes can be user configurable. "Prompting" does not depend upon the author to seek out the support but is initiated by the tool. "Prompting" is more than checking, correcting, and providing help and documentation as encompassed in guidelines 4, 5, 6. The goal of prompting the author is to encourage, urge and support the author in creating meaningful equivalent text without causing frustration that may cause the author to turn off access options. Prompting should be implemented in such a way that it causes a positive disposition and awareness on the part of the author toward accessible authoring practices. Are there any objections from members who were not part of the call? Jutta -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Tuesday, 20 June 2000 22:17:39 UTC