- From: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:17:43 -0400
- To: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- CC: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
> Regarding yesterday's teleconference, can people confirm the following: > > - we agree that we need to create an errata to change the definition > of "prompt" in the "Glossary of Terms and Definitions" section of the > Guidelines. There are inconsistencies in the definition itself. We > have not decided what the change will be although Phil has proposed > that we change the word "requires" to "requests" in the sentence "A > prompt requires author response." > - we agree that we need to make the meaning of the guideline clear > and explicit in the techniques but we do not have a compelling reason > to change the wording of the guideline itself. > - we agree that prompts should be on an author configurable schedule, > that they should be consistent with the look and feel of the > application and that the author can actively choose to cancel the > prompt. I agree. > The issues we need to address are: > 1. - does "prompt the author" mean that the software initiates a > request for information at some point in the authoring process that > the author is compelled to respond to or cancel > or > does software comply with the guideline if the request is present and > visible but need not be responded to and could be avoided when > certain authoring strategies are used (Phil's loophole)? I tend to agree with Phil, although I think the whole "pop-up in your face" discussion may have been too black and white. For instance, a developer could get around the problem of explicit prompting by adding a short alert (icon and explanatory text) to a pre-existing save or publish dialog. In this scenario, the author is already being interrupted with a request for information ("enter file name", "confirm write over", confirm publish to web", etc.) and an accessibility warning could be added without necessitating extra mouse clicks. > 2. Should the author be able to turn off all prompts in a single step? Not for a universal (all future pages) setting. Cheers, Jan -- Jan Richards jan.richards@utoronto.ca Access Software Designer Adaptive Technology Resource Centre University of Toronto (416) 946-7060
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2000 17:17:58 UTC