Re: please review and comment - choice on priorities

Eric
I agree with your comment that
>2. It needs to make sure the reader knows that the working group already
did
>the determining. It is not their  "choice".

but at the same time I don't want to refer to the "working group" in the
document.  So how about this:

The priority levels assigned to the checkpoints in this document assume
that the "author" is a ...

Regards,
Phill Jenkins,

Received on Friday, 10 December 1999 15:50:53 UTC