- From: gregory j. rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:13:31 -0500 (EST)
- To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
aloha, all! while charles and jutta have expressed the view that a structure view is a good idea, they have both opined that it fits into navigation.... as a totally blind page author, however, i find this too restrictive a distinction... while i agree with jutta and charles that it fits into the navigation section, i also agree with will that it is an integral part of checkpoint 3.1 why? web sites (at least those that are worth their weight in bytes) are not built in isolation--the author must be able not only be able to navigate a structured view, but be able to interact with the structure view, which means editing one portion of the site whilst reviewing the site as a whole... otherwise, i fear that, when authors such as myself do make the move to an authoring tool, we will be forced to edit/author pages in isolation... gregory. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net> Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html VICUG NYC: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html Read 'Em & Speak: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/books/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 8 March 1999 15:23:43 UTC