- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 18:54:55 -0500 (EST)
- To: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- cc: love26@gorge.net, "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I agree with Jutta - a structure view is a good idea, and it fits into navigation. Amaya provides two sorts of structure view - one is the "table of contents" which is made up of the headings in the document, nested according to their level, and the other is a structured view of the document source and the parent/child relationships of the varous elements. Charles On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Jutta Treviranus wrote: At 2:31 PM -0500 3/5/99, William Loughborough wrote: >I still propose 3.1.3 to emphasize that just a text view is not enough >and that the "structure tree" is important to authoring and not just to >navigating. In Amaya, if I'm not mistaken it is possible to do certain >editing functions directly from the structure view? I agree that we need to mention a structure view. I think it can fit into the navigation guideline because this would refer to navigation for editing not browsing and it would include controls to move around, edit and switch between views. Jutta --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 5 March 1999 18:55:27 UTC