Re: Public draft

My sense is that we should wait a week to get a guideline 2.1 that we are
all comfortable with in the group and then send it out for review.

Jutta

On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> It would be good to produce a new public working draft in the next week or
> so. It basically depends on having the terms and definitions section cleaned
> up, and sufficient material in the techniques (especially including the
> sample implementations section) document.
> 
> It takes a couple of weeks to cycle a draft through the interest group, so it
> would be nice to get it out as soon as possible. This depends in part on how
> much we can get done between as well as during teleconferences - I had hoped
> we could get there after the meeting this week, but it may take another week
> to have it ready.
> 
> This is an issue for discussion at the meeting tomorrow, assuming we get
> through the rest of the agenda.
> 
> Charles McCN
> 
> 
> 
> --Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
> phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
> W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
> MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
>

Received on Wednesday, 9 June 1999 06:26:39 UTC