- From: <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 06:26:10 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- cc: WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
My sense is that we should wait a week to get a guideline 2.1 that we are all comfortable with in the group and then send it out for review. Jutta On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > It would be good to produce a new public working draft in the next week or > so. It basically depends on having the terms and definitions section cleaned > up, and sufficient material in the techniques (especially including the > sample implementations section) document. > > It takes a couple of weeks to cycle a draft through the interest group, so it > would be nice to get it out as soon as possible. This depends in part on how > much we can get done between as well as during teleconferences - I had hoped > we could get there after the meeting this week, but it may take another week > to have it ready. > > This is an issue for discussion at the meeting tomorrow, assuming we get > through the rest of the agenda. > > Charles McCN > > > > --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org > phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles > W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI > MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA >
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 1999 06:26:39 UTC