- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 23:20:58 +0100
- To: Mickey Quenzer <mickeyq@integrityol.com>
- cc: "Charles (Chuck) Oppermann" <chuckop@microsoft.com>, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
> I strongly disagree. The reason I got interested in this group is because > TOOLS aren't all accessible. > If it wasn't for making things accessable, we wouldn't be here. To me, this group is not about making "things" accessible, it's about making sure that authoring tools generate accessible content. It's not like saying I don't want to deal with accessibility of au tools, just that it shouldn't happen here and today. Again, it's a matter of personal opinion: I think we can do a better job by focusing on this one problem. Time is of the essence, companies are rolling out new editors. The suggestion that it be dealt with in UA makes more sense to me, a AU is a UA too, one that does editing. > I think the more we mention this, the better the accessibility of documents > and authoring tools will be. Besides that, there is > Also, section 4 is about a halph of a page. NOT BIG AT ALL. Size has nothing to do with it, I'v seen group spend 3 months to agree on a single paragraph.
Received on Friday, 6 November 1998 17:21:10 UTC