- From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 12:28:58 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Chuck wrote: >However, I disagree with the focus on *documents*. My response: Point well taken. I think we have avoided the limiting term "document" in the actual document. Chuck wrote: >2. It was decided that a text only view be recommended. >>> > >You mean, allow the authoring tool to render the current page in text view? >How practical is that? I know that FrontPage simply calls out to Internet >Explorer to do it's rendering. Seems like a big work item to ask authoring >tool developer to build in a text view. Each authoring tool might have a >different concept of what "text view" means. Does it mean what LYNX does, >or does it mean the raw HTML without all the markup and no formatting? > The point here is to allow the author to see what it will look like with a text browser. This would not be a priority 1. Authoring tools frequently produce several views of the document, seperate from the final rendering.
Received on Friday, 6 November 1998 14:00:19 UTC