- From: Lauren Wood <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 10:33:49 -0700
- To: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
At 25/06/98 11:55 AM , William Loughborough wrote: >In Jan's paper at http://www.utoronto.ca/atrc/rd/hm/3tions.htm is a >'summary statement': "...it seems clear that published guidelines and >pleas for cooperation have been ineffective in increasing the actual use >of accessible HTML authoring practices on the Web. In order to change >this state of affairs, the accessible HTML community must win the >cooperation of the most popular Web authoring product makers..." > >WL:: Shouldn't this be our highest priority, instead of yet another set >of improved guidelines? Anybody got any ideas of how to improve our >results in this area? Mostly I lurk here, but I felt I had to reply to this, since SoftQuad's HoTMetaL is one of the few (maybe the only?) authoring tool with accessibility prompting support. We have a reasonably popular tool, but I don't know if anyone bought it because of the accessiblity; it's hard to find out. One thing I do know - if magazine reviews of HTML authoring tools contained information on accessibility, pointing out which tools help create accessible sites, and journalists could be persuaded not to yawn when we show them the accessibility features, and web-site makers could be told that people on slow modem lines might have money to spend on their products anyway.... then you would find the authoring tool makers happy to put effort into adding accessibility features. Customer demand is the best solution. There is no point to authoring tools adding support if no-one is going to use it. I don't know what the real solution is - for a while I sent email to lots of big commercial sites pointing out their deficiencies. I got back lots of email saying they'd redo their sites; usually when I went back the sites were worse from an accessibility perspective. Maybe it would help if lots of people sent email to these sites - customer demand probably would help there too. And then we'd get the trickle-down effects to the tools. Lauren
Received on Friday, 26 June 1998 19:02:41 UTC